Unit Plan 8 (Grade 6 Science): Engineering Space Missions

Grade 6 unit where students define space mission design problems, set criteria and constraints, brainstorm solutions, and evaluate designs for feasibility.

Unit Plan 8 (Grade 6 Science): Engineering Space Missions

Focus: Define and refine an engineering challenge related to space exploration or observation, establishing clear criteria and constraints and evaluating competing design solutions for feasibility and effectiveness.

Grade Level: 6

Subject Area: Science (Engineering Design • Earth & Space Science Context)

Total Unit Duration: 5 sessions (one week), 50–60 minutes per session


I. Introduction

In this unit, students act as space mission engineers. They explore real-world space exploration and observation challenges (e.g., landing safely on another world, protecting instruments from extreme temperatures, collecting data from far away). Working in teams, they define a design problem with specific criteria (what the design must do) and constraints (limits such as time, materials, or safety). They then brainstorm, sketch, and compare possible solutions using a simple, systematic process, building foundations for MS-ETS1-1 and MS-ETS1-2.

Essential Questions

  • What makes a good engineering problem for a space mission—and how do we define clear criteria and constraints?
  • How can we design solutions to help us explore or observe space more safely and effectively?
  • Why is it important to compare and evaluate multiple design ideas instead of choosing the first one we think of?
  • How can we use a systematic process (e.g., scoring or decision matrix) to decide which design best meets the criteria and constraints?

II. Objectives and Standards

Learning Objectives — Students will be able to:

  1. Describe what an engineering design problem is and identify the criteria and constraints for a space-related challenge (e.g., landing, data collection, protection from heat/cold).
  2. Work in teams to define a specific space mission problem (e.g., protect a lander, aim a telescope, deliver a probe) with clear, measurable criteria and realistic constraints.
  3. Generate multiple design ideas, using sketches, labels, and brief notes to communicate how each idea addresses the problem.
  4. Use a simple, systematic evaluation process (e.g., scoring rubric, decision matrix) to compare at least two design ideas against the criteria and constraints.
  5. Select and justify a recommended solution, explaining how it best meets the design criteria within the constraints, and reflect on possible improvements.

Standards Alignment — 6th Grade (NGSS-based custom)

  • MS-ETS1-1 — Define design problems with sufficient criteria and constraints to ensure successful solutions.
    • In this unit: students define a space mission challenge and specify what the solution must do and what limits it must work within.
  • MS-ETS1-2Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints.
    • In this unit: students create simple evaluation tools (e.g., scoring charts) to compare and rank design ideas.

Success Criteria — Student Language

  • I can explain what a design problem is and list the criteria and constraints for our space mission challenge.
  • I can help my team brainstorm and sketch more than one possible solution to our design problem.
  • I can use a scoring system or chart to compare different design ideas and decide which one is better.
  • I can clearly explain why our chosen design fits the criteria and constraints better than the others.
  • I can suggest at least one way to improve our solution if we had more time or resources.