Unit Plan 32 (Grade 8 Art): Formal Critique of Exhibition

Grade 8 art critique unit where students evaluate artworks and exhibitions using criteria, evidence, and formal critique language to assess overall quality.

Unit Plan 32 (Grade 8 Art): Formal Critique of Exhibition

Focus: Evaluate exhibition quality using criteria and evidence, applying formal critique language to individual artworks and the overall display.

Grade Level: 8

Subject Area: Art (Visual ArtsResponding & CritiquingExhibition Review)

Total Unit Duration: 5 sessions (one week), 50–60 minutes per session


I. Introduction

In this unit, students step into the role of critics and curators, using formal criteria to evaluate both individual artworks and the overall quality of the exhibition. Building on their presentation and artist statement work, they learn to use terms like craftsmanship, composition, originality, and effectiveness of communication to describe strengths and growth areas. Through gallery walks, writing, and structured discussion, students practice supporting their opinions with specific visual evidence and offering constructive feedback that honors the work and pushes it forward.

Essential Questions

  • How can clear criteria help us evaluate artwork and exhibitions more fairly and thoughtfully?
  • What is the difference between a personal opinion (“I like it”) and an evidence-based critique?
  • How do factors such as craftsmanship, composition, originality, and communication affect exhibition quality?
  • In what ways can a critique help an artist or class improve future work and displays?
  • How can we talk honestly about strengths and challenges in artwork while remaining respectful and constructive?

II. Objectives and Standards

Learning Objectives — Students will be able to:

  1. Identify and explain evaluation criteria such as craftsmanship, composition, originality, and effectiveness of communication in relation to an exhibition (VA:Re9.8a).
  2. Use a rubric or checklist to evaluate individual artworks with reference to specific visual evidence.
  3. Evaluate at least one section of the exhibition (or a mock display) for coherence, impact, and clarity of message, using criteria-based notes.
  4. Participate in formal critique discussions, offering strengths and suggestions that are grounded in criteria and evidence.
  5. Write a short exhibition or artwork review that synthesizes rubric ratings, observations, and thoughtful commentary.

Standards Alignment — 8th Grade (NCAS-Aligned)

  • VA:Re9.8a — Evaluate artwork using established criteria such as craftsmanship, composition, originality, and effectiveness of communication.
    • Example: Students use a rubric to critique peer artwork and provide evidence-based feedback.

Success Criteria — Student Language

  • I can name and use evaluation criteria (craftsmanship, composition, originality, communication) when I talk about artwork.
  • I can give feedback that includes specific visual evidence, not just “I like it” or “I don’t like it.”
  • I can explain how well a piece or section of the exhibition communicates its message.
  • I can participate in a formal critique in a way that is honest, respectful, and helpful.
  • I can write a short critique that clearly explains my judgments and reasons.