Unit Plan 13 (Grade 8 ELA): Informational Text Structures Across Articles

8th graders analyze how authors use sequence, cause/effect, and comparison structures to connect ideas and events across multiple informational texts, building comprehension and synthesizing structure-driven insights across a text set.

Unit Plan 13 (Grade 8 ELA): Informational Text Structures Across Articles

Focus: Sequence, cause/effect, comparison; reading across a text set

Grade Level: 8

Subject Area: English Language Arts (Reading—Informational)

Total Unit Duration: 5 sessions (one week), 50–60 minutes per session


I. Introduction

Writers of informational texts make structural choices—sequence, cause/effect, comparison—that guide readers to see connections and distinctions among people, ideas, and events. This week, students analyze those choices in a three-piece text set on a shared topic, track how sections contribute to the whole, and synthesize structure-driven insights across articles to build independent, grade-level comprehension.


II. Objectives and Standards

Learning Objectives — Students will be able to…

  1. Identify and analyze dominant and embedded structures (sequence, cause/effect, comparison) and explain how sections contribute to ideas in the whole text (RI.8.5).
  2. Trace connections and distinctions among individuals, ideas, and events using authors’ organizational moves (RI.8.3).
  3. Read and annotate grade-level complex informational texts with increasing independence; produce a structure-aware synthesis across a text set (RI.8.10).

Standards Alignment — CCSS Grade 8

  • RI.8.5: Analyze the structure an author uses, including how major sections contribute to the whole and to idea development.
  • RI.8.3: Analyze how a text makes connections among and distinctions between individuals, ideas, or events (e.g., comparisons, analogies, categories).
  • RI.8.10: Read and comprehend literary nonfiction at the high end of grades 6–8 complexity independently and proficiently.

Success Criteria — student language

  • I can name the dominant structure of a section and cite signal words/features.
  • I can explain how a section advances or clarifies the author’s overall idea.
  • I can map connections/distinctions among key ideas/people/events.
  • I can write a cross-text synthesis that uses structure language (e.g., “in contrast,” “as a result,” “subsequently”).