Unit Plan 33 (Grade 8 ELA): Summarizing & Synthesizing Information

Grade 8 ELA unit: master objective summaries, cross-text synthesis, and concise evidence lines using informational texts—build stronger analysis, reasoning, and citations.

Unit Plan 33 (Grade 8 ELA): Summarizing & Synthesizing Information

Focus: Condensing key ideas; cross-text connections; evidence lines

Grade Level: 8

Subject Area: English Language Arts (Reading—Informational; Writing—Analytical)

Total Unit Duration: 5 sessions (one week), 50–60 minutes per session


I. Introduction

Power readers don’t just retell—they distill and connect. This week builds skill with objective summaries (no opinions, just central ideas + key details) and synthesis (how multiple texts confirm, extend, or complicate one another). Students will also craft concise evidence lines that link a claim to cross-text proof with clear reasoning.


II. Objectives and Standards

Learning Objectives — Students will be able to…

  1. Determine central ideas and produce concise, objective summaries of informational texts (RI.8.2).
  2. Integrate and reconcile ideas across at least two texts on the same topic, noting agreements, conflicts, and gaps (RI.8.9).
  3. Draw and cite evidence from texts to support analysis and synthesis in short analytic writing (W.8.9).

Standards Alignment — CCSS Grade 8

  • RI.8.2: Determine a text’s central idea and analyze its development; provide an objective summary.
  • RI.8.9: Analyze a case in which two or more texts provide conflicting information; identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.
  • W.8.9: Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.

Success Criteria — student language

  • I can state the central idea in one tight sentence and select only the most important details.
  • My summary is objective—no opinions, no extra examples.
  • I can show how two texts connect (confirm/extend/complicate/contrast) with precise references.
  • My evidence line (claim → evidence A → evidence B → reasoning) is clear and well-cited.